Learn how Countly and PostHog differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these product analytics is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Both Countly and PostHog have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
PostHog significantly outpaces Countly in community adoption with 32,994 stars compared to 5,850 stars on GitHub. This 5.6x difference suggests PostHog has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, PostHog has 2,578 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Countly last updated 1 day ago and PostHog 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: PostHog leverages CSS, JSX, Python, SCSS, Golang, Rust, C, Objective-C, C++.
Countly has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to PostHog which began 6 years ago. This 7.8-year head start suggests Countly may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Product Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Countly also focuses on Web Analytics.
Both Countly and PostHog offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs