Learn how Countly and Litlyx differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Countly appears to have several advantages over Litlyx, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Countly significantly outpaces Litlyx in community adoption with 5,902 stars compared to 1,743 stars on GitHub. This 3.4x difference suggests Countly has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Countly has 980 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Countly and Litlyx are moving at much the same rate, adding 16 stars and adding 2 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.3% vs +0.1%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Countly shows more recent development activity with its last commit 3 days ago, while Litlyx was last updated 9 months ago. This suggests Countly is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Countly uses Bash while Litlyx leverages CSS, SCSS, Vue, Nuxt.js.
Countly has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Litlyx which began 2 years ago. This 12.2-year head start suggests Countly may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Countly is licensed under other while Litlyx uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics, Product Analytics.
Both Countly and Litlyx offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs