Learn how Countly and Litlyx differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 5 months and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Countly appears to have several advantages over Litlyx, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Countly significantly outpaces Litlyx in community adoption with 5,850 stars compared to 1,691 stars on GitHub. This 3.5x difference suggests Countly has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Countly has 981 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Countly shows more recent development activity with its last commit 1 day ago, while Litlyx was last updated 5 months ago. This suggests Countly is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Countly uses Bash while Litlyx leverages CSS, SCSS, Vue, Nuxt.js.
Countly has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Litlyx which began 2 years ago. This 12.2-year head start suggests Countly may have more mature features and established processes.
Litlyx is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Countly's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics, Product Analytics.
Both Countly and Litlyx offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs