Countly vs Plausible

Plausible significantly outpaces Countly in community adoption with 29,063 stars compared to 5,902 stars on GitHub. This 4.9x difference suggests Plausible has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Plausible has 1,865 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Plausible is growing faster, adding 528 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 16 stars for Countly (+0.3%). Plausible is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Both projects show recent activity, with Countly last updated 3 days ago and Plausible 2 days ago.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Plausible leverages CSS, JSX, PHP, Elixir.

Countly has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Plausible which began 8 years ago. This 6.6-year head start suggests Countly may have more mature features and established processes.

The projects use different licenses: Countly is licensed under other while Plausible uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Countly also focuses on Product Analytics.

Both Countly and Plausible offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.