Learn how Countly and Plausible differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Plausible appears to have several advantages over Countly, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Plausible significantly outpaces Countly in community adoption with 28,727 stars compared to 5,891 stars on GitHub. This 4.9x difference suggests Plausible has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Plausible has 1,813 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Plausible is growing faster, adding 726 stars in the last 30 days (+2.6%) against adding 6 stars for Countly (+0.1%). Plausible is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Countly last updated 9 hours ago and Plausible 5 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Plausible leverages CSS, JSX, PHP, Elixir.
Countly has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Plausible which began 8 years ago. This 6.6-year head start suggests Countly may have more mature features and established processes.
Plausible is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Countly's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Countly also focuses on Product Analytics.
Both Countly and Plausible offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs