Learn how Betterlytics and Plausible differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Plausible appears to have several advantages over Betterlytics, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Plausible significantly outpaces Betterlytics in community adoption with 29,304 stars compared to 177 stars on GitHub. This 165.6x difference suggests Plausible has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Plausible has 1,879 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Plausible is growing faster, adding 435 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 1 stars for Betterlytics (+0.6%). Plausible is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Betterlytics last updated 1 day ago and Plausible 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Betterlytics uses Next.js, Rust while Plausible leverages PHP, Elixir.
Plausible has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Betterlytics which began 1 year ago. This 6.5-year head start suggests Plausible may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both Betterlytics and Plausible offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs