Learn how Betterlytics and Fathom Lite differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Both Betterlytics and Fathom Lite have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Fathom Lite significantly outpaces Betterlytics in community adoption with 8,006 stars compared to 156 stars on GitHub. This 51.3x difference suggests Fathom Lite has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Fathom Lite has 380 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Betterlytics shows more recent development activity with its last commit 12 hours ago, while Fathom Lite was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Betterlytics is being more actively maintained.
Fathom Lite has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Betterlytics which began 1 year ago. This 8.6-year head start suggests Fathom Lite may have more mature features and established processes.
Fathom Lite uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Betterlytics's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Betterlytics provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Fathom Lite may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs