What is the main difference between Fathom Lite and HitKeep?

Fathom Lite and HitKeep are both web analytics but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Fathom Lite or HitKeep?

The choice between Fathom Lite and HitKeep depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Fathom Lite to HitKeep?

Migration between Fathom Lite and HitKeep is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

c15t – Open-source cookie banner, built for control and lightening fast modern web apps.

Learn More

Learn more

Fathom Lite vs HitKeep

Learn how Fathom Lite and HitKeep differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.

Fathom Lite

A simple, privacy-first analytics platform that provides valuable website insights without compromising visitor data or requiring cookie consent banners.

Visit Fathom Lite Read more

Stars
8,007
Forks
380
Last commit
1 month ago
Repository age
9 years
License
MIT

View Repository

Auto-fetched 8 hours ago.

HitKeep

Self-hosted or managed web analytics with zero external dependencies. Cookie-free tracking, full data sovereignty, and single binary deployment for organizations that own their data.

Visit HitKeep Read more

Stars
42
Forks
2
Last commit
19 hours ago
Repository age
6 months
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes

View Repository

Auto-fetched 8 hours ago.

Detailed Comparison

Both Fathom Lite and HitKeep have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Fathom Lite wins

Community & Popularity

Fathom Lite significantly outpaces HitKeep in community adoption with 8,007 stars compared to 42 stars on GitHub. This 190.6x difference suggests Fathom Lite has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Fathom Lite has 380 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

HitKeep wins

Development Activity

HitKeep shows more recent development activity with its last commit 19 hours ago, while Fathom Lite was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests HitKeep is being more actively maintained.

Fathom Lite wins

Project Maturity

Fathom Lite has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to HitKeep which began 6 months ago. This 9.1-year head start suggests Fathom Lite may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.

HitKeep wins

Hosting & Deployment

HitKeep provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Fathom Lite may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.