What is the main difference between Fathom Lite and HitKeep?

Fathom Lite and HitKeep are both web analytics but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Fathom Lite or HitKeep?

The choice between Fathom Lite and HitKeep depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Fathom Lite to HitKeep?

Migration between Fathom Lite and HitKeep is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn more

Fathom Lite vs HitKeep

Learn how Fathom Lite and HitKeep differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.

Fathom Lite

A simple, privacy-first analytics platform that provides valuable website insights without compromising visitor data or requiring cookie consent banners.

Visit Fathom Lite Read more

8,035stars+14(+0.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
8 months ago
Repository age
10 years
Version
v1.3.1
License
MIT
Repository
usefathom/fathom

HitKeep

Self-hosted or managed web analytics with zero external dependencies. Cookie-free tracking, full data sovereignty, and single binary deployment for organizations that own their data.

Visit HitKeep Read more

106stars

Last 30 days

Last commit
7 days ago
Repository age
1 year
Version
v2.16.1
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
pascalebeier/hitkeep

Detailed Comparison

Both Fathom Lite and HitKeep have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Fathom Lite wins

Community & Popularity

Fathom Lite significantly outpaces HitKeep in community adoption with 8,035 stars compared to 106 stars on GitHub. This 75.8x difference suggests Fathom Lite has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Fathom Lite has 388 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

HitKeep wins

Development Activity

HitKeep shows more recent development activity with its last commit 7 days ago, while Fathom Lite was last updated 8 months ago. This suggests HitKeep is being more actively maintained.

Fathom Lite wins

Project Maturity

Fathom Lite has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to HitKeep which began 1 year ago. This 9.1-year head start suggests Fathom Lite may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.

HitKeep wins

Hosting & Deployment

HitKeep provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Fathom Lite may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.