Learn how HitKeep and Tianji differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v2.16.1License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
pascalebeier/hitkeep
Last 30 days
Last commit
21 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v1.34.0License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
msgbyte/tianji
Both HitKeep and Tianji have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Tianji significantly outpaces HitKeep in community adoption with 3,119 stars compared to 105 stars on GitHub. This 29.7x difference suggests Tianji has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Tianji has 199 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with HitKeep last updated 1 day ago and Tianji 21 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: HitKeep uses SCSS while Tianji leverages JSX, Next.js.
Tianji has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to HitKeep which began 1 year ago. This 2.2-year head start suggests Tianji may have more mature features and established processes.
HitKeep uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Tianji's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Tianji extends into Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages.
Both HitKeep and Tianji offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs