Learn how Statusnook and Tianji differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these status pages is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Statusnook and Tianji have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Tianji significantly outpaces Statusnook in community adoption with 3,085 stars compared to 975 stars on GitHub. This 3.2x difference suggests Tianji has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Tianji has 196 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Statusnook and Tianji are moving at much the same rate, adding 1 stars and adding 8 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.1% vs +0.3%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Tianji shows more recent development activity with its last commit 5 days ago, while Statusnook was last updated 2 years ago. This suggests Tianji is being more actively maintained.
Both projects started around the same time, with Statusnook beginning 2 years ago and Tianji 3 years ago.
Statusnook uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Tianji's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Status Pages. However, they also have distinct specializations: Tianji extends into Web Analytics, Uptime Monitoring.
Both Statusnook and Tianji offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs