Learn how OpenStatus and Tianji differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
openstatus
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v1.33.12License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
msgbyte/tianji
OpenStatus appears to have several advantages over Tianji, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenStatus leads in popularity with 9,232 stars vs 3,121 stars for Tianji. The 196% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenStatus has 796 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
OpenStatus is growing faster, adding 90 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against adding 21 stars for Tianji (+0.7%). OpenStatus is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenStatus last updated 5 hours ago and Tianji 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Golang.
Both projects started around the same time, with OpenStatus beginning 3 years ago and Tianji 3 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: OpenStatus is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Tianji uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages. However, they also have distinct specializations: Tianji extends into Web Analytics.
Both OpenStatus and Tianji offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs