Learn how OpenStatus and Tianji differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

OpenStatus appears to have several advantages over Tianji, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenStatus leads in popularity with 9,019 stars vs 3,085 stars for Tianji. The 192% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenStatus has 755 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
OpenStatus is growing faster, adding 119 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against adding 8 stars for Tianji (+0.3%). OpenStatus is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenStatus last updated 16 hours ago and Tianji 5 days ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with OpenStatus beginning 3 years ago and Tianji 3 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: OpenStatus is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Tianji uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages. However, they also have distinct specializations: Tianji extends into Web Analytics.
Both OpenStatus and Tianji offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs