Learn how OpenStatus and Uptimepage differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
openstatus
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
6 monthsLicense
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
uptimepage
OpenStatus appears to have several advantages over Uptimepage, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenStatus significantly outpaces Uptimepage in community adoption with 9,232 stars compared to 49 stars on GitHub. This 188.4x difference suggests OpenStatus has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenStatus has 796 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenStatus last updated 5 hours ago and Uptimepage 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenStatus uses CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Golang while Uptimepage leverages Python, Rust.
OpenStatus has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Uptimepage which began 6 months ago. This 2.9-year head start suggests OpenStatus may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages.
Both OpenStatus and Uptimepage offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs