Learn how OpenStatus and Uptimepage differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

OpenStatus appears to have several advantages over Uptimepage, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenStatus significantly outpaces Uptimepage in community adoption with 9,019 stars compared to 17 stars on GitHub. This 530.5x difference suggests OpenStatus has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenStatus has 755 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenStatus last updated 16 hours ago and Uptimepage 3 days ago.
OpenStatus has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Uptimepage which began 4 months ago. This 2.9-year head start suggests OpenStatus may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages.
Both OpenStatus and Uptimepage offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs