What is the main difference between Uptime Kuma and Uptimepage?

Uptime Kuma and Uptimepage are both uptime monitoring tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Uptime Kuma or Uptimepage?

The choice between Uptime Kuma and Uptimepage depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Uptime Kuma to Uptimepage?

Migration between Uptime Kuma and Uptimepage is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn more

Uptime Kuma vs Uptimepage

Learn how Uptime Kuma and Uptimepage differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.

Uptime Kuma

Monitors websites, APIs, and services with real-time alerts, a status page, and support for dozens of notification channels. Self-hosted and Docker-friendly.

Visit Uptime Kuma Read more

92,922stars+1,069(+1.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
4 hours ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
2.5.7
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
louislam/uptime-kuma

Uptimepage

Hosted uptime monitoring with multi-region checks, eight monitor types, on-call rotations, escalation policies, and public status pages for SaaS teams and agencies.

Visit Uptimepage Read more

49stars

Last 30 days

Last commit
6 hours ago
Repository age
6 months
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
uptimepage

Detailed Comparison

Uptime Kuma appears to have several advantages over Uptimepage, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Uptime Kuma wins

Community & Popularity

Uptime Kuma significantly outpaces Uptimepage in community adoption with 92,922 stars compared to 49 stars on GitHub. This 1896.4x difference suggests Uptime Kuma has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Uptime Kuma has 8,610 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Uptime Kuma last updated 4 hours ago and Uptimepage 6 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Uptime Kuma uses Typescript, Golang, SCSS, PHP, Vue, Java, C# while Uptimepage leverages Rust.

Uptime Kuma wins

Project Maturity

Uptime Kuma has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Uptimepage which began 6 months ago. This 4.9-year head start suggests Uptime Kuma may have more mature features and established processes.

Uptime Kuma wins

Licensing

Uptime Kuma uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Uptimepage's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages. However, they also have distinct specializations: Uptime Kuma also focuses on Infrastructure Monitoring.

Comparable