Learn how Gatus and Uptimepage differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v5.37.0License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
twin/gatus
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
6 monthsLicense
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
uptimepage
Gatus appears to have several advantages over Uptimepage, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Gatus significantly outpaces Uptimepage in community adoption with 12,409 stars compared to 49 stars on GitHub. This 253.2x difference suggests Gatus has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Gatus has 876 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Gatus last updated 6 hours ago and Uptimepage 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Gatus uses CSS, Golang, Vue while Uptimepage leverages Bash, Python, Rust.
Gatus has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Uptimepage which began 6 months ago. This 6.8-year head start suggests Gatus may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Gatus is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Uptimepage uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages. However, they also have distinct specializations: Gatus also focuses on Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both Gatus and Uptimepage offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs