Learn how Cachet and Gatus differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 days agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
v2.4.1Self-hosted
YesRepository
cachethq/cachet
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v5.38.0License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
twin/gatus
Both Cachet and Gatus have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Cachet having 15,262 stars and Gatus having 12,587 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Cachet has 1,630 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Gatus is growing faster, adding 310 stars in the last 30 days (+2.5%) against adding 8 stars for Cachet (+0.1%). Gatus is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cachet last updated 6 days ago and Gatus 2 days ago.
Cachet uses PHP, Laravel while Gatus leverages JavaScript, CSS, Golang, Vue.
Cachet has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Gatus which began 7 years ago. This 4.9-year head start suggests Cachet may have more mature features and established processes.
Gatus is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Cachet's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages. However, they also have distinct specializations: Gatus extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both Cachet and Gatus offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs