Learn how Cachet and EasyMonitor differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Cachet and EasyMonitor have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Cachet significantly outpaces EasyMonitor in community adoption with 15,222 stars compared to 68 stars on GitHub. This 223.9x difference suggests Cachet has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Cachet has 1,631 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cachet last updated 3 days ago and EasyMonitor 29 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with PHP, Laravel. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: EasyMonitor leverages JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Golang.
Cachet has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to EasyMonitor which began 10 months ago. This 11.1-year head start suggests Cachet may have more mature features and established processes.
EasyMonitor is licensed under MIT, while Cachet's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages.
Both Cachet and EasyMonitor offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs