Learn how Cachet and OpenStatus differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these status pages is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Cachet appears to have several advantages over OpenStatus, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Cachet leads in popularity with 15,022 stars vs 8,630 stars for OpenStatus. The 74% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Cachet has 1,613 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cachet last updated 2 days ago and OpenStatus 12 hours ago.
Cachet uses PHP, Laravel while OpenStatus leverages JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Golang.
Cachet has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to OpenStatus which began 3 years ago. This 8.7-year head start suggests Cachet may have more mature features and established processes.
OpenStatus is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Cachet's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Status Pages, Uptime Monitoring.
Cachet provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenStatus may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.