Learn how Cachet and OpenStatus differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these status pages is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Cachet and OpenStatus have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Cachet leads in popularity with 15,053 stars vs 8,692 stars for OpenStatus. The 73% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Cachet has 1,614 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cachet last updated 17 days ago and OpenStatus 1 day ago.
Cachet uses PHP, Laravel while OpenStatus leverages JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Golang.
Cachet has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to OpenStatus which began 3 years ago. This 8.7-year head start suggests Cachet may have more mature features and established processes.
OpenStatus is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Cachet's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Status Pages, Uptime Monitoring.
Both Cachet and OpenStatus offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs