Learn how Gatus and OpenStatus differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Gatus appears to have several advantages over OpenStatus, particularly in growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Gatus having 11,857 stars and OpenStatus having 8,994 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Gatus has 802 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Gatus is growing faster, adding 295 stars in the last 30 days (+2.6%) against adding 112 stars for OpenStatus (+1.3%). Gatus is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Gatus last updated 2 days ago and OpenStatus 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Gatus uses Vue while OpenStatus leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js.
Gatus has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to OpenStatus which began 3 years ago. This 3.8-year head start suggests Gatus may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Gatus is licensed under Apache-2.0 while OpenStatus uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages. However, they also have distinct specializations: Gatus also focuses on Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both Gatus and OpenStatus offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs