What is the main difference between Gatus and Uptime Kuma?

Gatus and Uptime Kuma are both infrastructure monitoring tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Gatus or Uptime Kuma?

The choice between Gatus and Uptime Kuma depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Gatus to Uptime Kuma?

Migration between Gatus and Uptime Kuma is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn More

Learn more

Gatus vs Uptime Kuma

Learn how Gatus and Uptime Kuma differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.

Gatus

A highly customizable monitoring solution that provides automated status pages, extensive alerting options, and detailed testing capabilities for your services and infrastructure

Visit Gatus Read more

Stars
11,018
Forks
737
Last commit
3 days ago
Repository age
7 years
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes

View Repository

Auto-fetched 44 minutes ago.

Uptime Kuma

A user-friendly, open-source uptime monitoring solution for tracking website and service availability

Visit Uptime Kuma Read more

Stars
87,076
Forks
7,881
Last commit
13 hours ago
Repository age
5 years
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes

View Repository

Auto-fetched 44 minutes ago.

Detailed Comparison

Both Gatus and Uptime Kuma have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Uptime Kuma wins

Community & Popularity

Uptime Kuma significantly outpaces Gatus in community adoption with 87,076 stars compared to 11,018 stars on GitHub. This 7.9x difference suggests Uptime Kuma has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Uptime Kuma has 7,881 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Gatus last updated 3 days ago and Uptime Kuma 13 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Golang, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Gatus uses CSS while Uptime Kuma leverages Bash, Typescript, Python, SCSS, PHP, Java, C#.

Gatus wins

Project Maturity

Gatus has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Uptime Kuma which began 5 years ago. This 1.9-year head start suggests Gatus may have more mature features and established processes.

Uptime Kuma wins

Licensing

Uptime Kuma uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Gatus's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable