What is the main difference between Gatus and Uptime Kuma?

Gatus and Uptime Kuma are both infrastructure monitoring tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Gatus or Uptime Kuma?

The choice between Gatus and Uptime Kuma depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Gatus to Uptime Kuma?

Migration between Gatus and Uptime Kuma is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn more

Gatus vs Uptime Kuma

Learn how Gatus and Uptime Kuma differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.

Gatus

A highly customizable monitoring solution that provides automated status pages, extensive alerting options, and detailed testing capabilities for your services and infrastructure

Visit Gatus Read more

12,587stars+310(+2.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
7 years
Version
v5.38.0
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
twin/gatus

Uptime Kuma

Monitors websites, APIs, and services with real-time alerts, a status page, and support for dozens of notification channels. Self-hosted and Docker-friendly.

Visit Uptime Kuma Read more

93,364stars+1,098(+1.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
13 hours ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
2.5.9
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
louislam/uptime-kuma

Detailed Comparison

Both Gatus and Uptime Kuma have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Uptime Kuma wins

Community & Popularity

Uptime Kuma significantly outpaces Gatus in community adoption with 93,364 stars compared to 12,587 stars on GitHub. This 7.4x difference suggests Uptime Kuma has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Uptime Kuma has 8,677 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Gatus wins

Growth Momentum

Gatus is growing faster, adding 310 stars in the last 30 days (+2.5%) against adding 1,098 stars for Uptime Kuma (+1.2%). Gatus is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Gatus last updated 2 days ago and Uptime Kuma 13 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Golang, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Gatus uses CSS while Uptime Kuma leverages Bash, Typescript, Python, SCSS, PHP, Java, C#.

Gatus wins

Project Maturity

Gatus has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Uptime Kuma which began 5 years ago. This 1.9-year head start suggests Gatus may have more mature features and established processes.

Uptime Kuma wins

Licensing

Uptime Kuma uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Gatus's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable