Ad
 
Learn more

Gatus vs Uptime Kuma

Learn how Gatus and Uptime Kuma differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Gatus

Gatus

A highly customizable monitoring solution that provides automated status pages, extensive alerting options, and detailed testing capabilities for your services and infrastructure
  • Stars


    10,814
  • Forks


    728
  • Last commit


    21 hours ago
  • Repository age


    7 years
  • License


    Apache-2.0
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Gatus
Favicon of Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma

A user-friendly, open-source uptime monitoring solution for tracking website and service availability
  • Stars


    86,102
  • Forks


    7,754
  • Last commit


    1 day ago
  • Repository age


    5 years
  • License


    MIT
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Uptime Kuma

Detailed Comparison

Both Gatus and Uptime Kuma have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Uptime Kuma wins
Community & Popularity

Uptime Kuma significantly outpaces Gatus in community adoption with 86,102 stars compared to 10,814 stars on GitHub. This 8.0x difference suggests Uptime Kuma has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Uptime Kuma has 7,754 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Gatus last updated 21 hours ago and Uptime Kuma 1 day ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Golang, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Gatus uses CSS while Uptime Kuma leverages Bash, Typescript, Python, SCSS, PHP, Java, C#.

Gatus wins
Project Maturity

Gatus has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Uptime Kuma which began 5 years ago. This 1.9-year head start suggests Gatus may have more mature features and established processes.

Uptime Kuma wins
Licensing

Uptime Kuma uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Gatus's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring, Status Pages, Uptime Monitoring.

Comparable
Hosting & Deployment

Both Gatus and Uptime Kuma offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.