Learn how Gatus and Uptime Kuma differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Gatus and Uptime Kuma have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Uptime Kuma significantly outpaces Gatus in community adoption with 86,102 stars compared to 10,814 stars on GitHub. This 8.0x difference suggests Uptime Kuma has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Uptime Kuma has 7,754 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Gatus last updated 21 hours ago and Uptime Kuma 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Golang, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Gatus uses CSS while Uptime Kuma leverages Bash, Typescript, Python, SCSS, PHP, Java, C#.
Gatus has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Uptime Kuma which began 5 years ago. This 1.9-year head start suggests Gatus may have more mature features and established processes.
Uptime Kuma uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Gatus's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring, Status Pages, Uptime Monitoring.
Both Gatus and Uptime Kuma offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.