Learn how Gatus and OneUptime differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these status pages is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Gatus appears to have several advantages over OneUptime, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Gatus leads in popularity with 10,814 stars vs 6,913 stars for OneUptime. The 56% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Gatus has 728 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Gatus last updated 22 hours ago and OneUptime 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Gatus uses Vue while OneUptime leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, C#.
Gatus has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to OneUptime which began 5 years ago. This 1.8-year head start suggests Gatus may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Status Pages, Uptime Monitoring. However, they also have distinct specializations: Gatus also focuses on Infrastructure Monitoring while OneUptime extends into Performance Monitoring (APM).
Both Gatus and OneUptime offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.