Learn how Gatus and OneUptime differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Gatus appears to have several advantages over OneUptime, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Gatus leads in popularity with 11,857 stars vs 7,481 stars for OneUptime. The 58% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Gatus has 802 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Gatus is growing faster, adding 295 stars in the last 30 days (+2.6%) against adding 167 stars for OneUptime (+2.3%). Gatus is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Gatus last updated 2 days ago and OneUptime 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Gatus uses Vue while OneUptime leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, C#.
Gatus has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to OneUptime which began 5 years ago. This 1.8-year head start suggests Gatus may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages. However, they also have distinct specializations: Gatus also focuses on Infrastructure Monitoring while OneUptime extends into Performance Monitoring (APM).
Both Gatus and OneUptime offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.