Learn how EasyMonitor and Gatus differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both EasyMonitor and Gatus have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Gatus significantly outpaces EasyMonitor in community adoption with 11,857 stars compared to 68 stars on GitHub. This 174.4x difference suggests Gatus has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Gatus has 802 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with EasyMonitor last updated 29 days ago and Gatus 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: EasyMonitor uses Bash, PHP, Laravel while Gatus leverages Vue.
Gatus has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to EasyMonitor which began 10 months ago. This 6.2-year head start suggests Gatus may have more mature features and established processes.
EasyMonitor uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Gatus's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages. However, they also have distinct specializations: Gatus extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both EasyMonitor and Gatus offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs