Learn how Gatus and Tianji differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Gatus appears to have several advantages over Tianji, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Gatus significantly outpaces Tianji in community adoption with 11,903 stars compared to 3,085 stars on GitHub. This 3.9x difference suggests Gatus has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Gatus has 806 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Gatus is growing faster, adding 268 stars in the last 30 days (+2.3%) against adding 8 stars for Tianji (+0.3%). Gatus is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Gatus last updated 9 days ago and Tianji 5 days ago.
Gatus has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Tianji which began 3 years ago. This 4.0-year head start suggests Gatus may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages. However, they also have distinct specializations: Gatus also focuses on Infrastructure Monitoring while Tianji extends into Web Analytics.
Both Gatus and Tianji offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs