Learn how Litlyx and Tianji differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Tianji appears to have several advantages over Litlyx, particularly in popularity, growth and activity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Tianji leads in popularity with 3,114 stars vs 1,744 stars for Litlyx. The 79% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Tianji has 195 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Tianji is growing faster, adding 15 stars in the last 30 days (+0.5%) against adding 0 stars for Litlyx (0%). Tianji is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Tianji shows more recent development activity with its last commit 21 hours ago, while Litlyx was last updated 11 months ago. This suggests Tianji is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Litlyx uses SCSS, Vue, Nuxt.js while Tianji leverages Bash, JSX, Next.js, Golang.
Both projects started around the same time, with Litlyx beginning 2 years ago and Tianji 3 years ago.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Litlyx also focuses on Product Analytics while Tianji extends into Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages.
Both Litlyx and Tianji offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs