What is the main difference between Matomo and Tianji?

Matomo and Tianji are both web analytics but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Matomo or Tianji?

The choice between Matomo and Tianji depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Matomo to Tianji?

Migration between Matomo and Tianji is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn More

Matomo vs Tianji

Learn how Matomo and Tianji differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.

Matomo

Comprehensive web analytics platform offering full data ownership, privacy protection, and customizable insights for data-driven decision making.

Visit Matomo Read more

21,960stars+72(+0.3%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
9 hours ago
Repository age
16 years
Version
5.14.1
License
GPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
matomo-org/matomo

Tianji

Self-hostable platform combining website analytics, uptime monitoring, server status, Docker tracking, status pages, and telemetry for indie developers and small teams.

Visit Tianji Read more

3,114stars+15(+0.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
21 hours ago
Repository age
3 years
Version
v1.33.11
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
msgbyte/tianji

Detailed Comparison

Matomo appears to have several advantages over Tianji, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Matomo wins

Community & Popularity

Matomo significantly outpaces Tianji in community adoption with 21,960 stars compared to 3,114 stars on GitHub. This 7.1x difference suggests Matomo has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Matomo has 2,918 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Growth Momentum

Matomo and Tianji are moving at much the same rate, adding 72 stars and adding 15 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.3% vs +0.5%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Matomo last updated 9 hours ago and Tianji 21 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Matomo uses PHP, Vue while Tianji leverages JSX, Next.js, Golang.

Matomo wins

Project Maturity

Matomo has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to Tianji which began 3 years ago. This 12.6-year head start suggests Matomo may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Matomo is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Tianji uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Tianji extends into Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages.

Comparable