What is the main difference between Plausible and Tianji?

Plausible and Tianji are both web analytics but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Plausible or Tianji?

The choice between Plausible and Tianji depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Plausible to Tianji?

Migration between Plausible and Tianji is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

InfluxDB – The purpose-built time series platform for high-velocity ingestion and real-time queries at scale.

Learn more

Plausible vs Tianji

Learn how Plausible and Tianji differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.

Plausible

Simple, open-source web analytics tool that respects user privacy and provides valuable insights without compromising data protection.

Visit Plausible Read more

29,793stars+441(+1.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
1 day ago
Repository age
8 years
Version
v3.2.1
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
plausible/analytics

Tianji

Self-hostable platform combining website analytics, uptime monitoring, server status, Docker tracking, status pages, and telemetry for indie developers and small teams.

Visit Tianji Read more

3,119stars+15(+0.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
21 hours ago
Repository age
3 years
Version
v1.34.0
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
msgbyte/tianji

Detailed Comparison

Plausible appears to have several advantages over Tianji, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Plausible wins

Community & Popularity

Plausible significantly outpaces Tianji in community adoption with 29,793 stars compared to 3,119 stars on GitHub. This 9.6x difference suggests Plausible has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Plausible has 1,931 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Plausible wins

Growth Momentum

Plausible is growing faster, adding 441 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 15 stars for Tianji (+0.5%). Plausible is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Plausible last updated 1 day ago and Tianji 21 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Plausible uses PHP, Elixir while Tianji leverages Next.js, Golang.

Plausible wins

Project Maturity

Plausible has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Tianji which began 3 years ago. This 4.8-year head start suggests Plausible may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Plausible is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Tianji uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Tianji extends into Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages.

Comparable