Learn how Litlyx and Plausible differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 5 months and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Plausible appears to have several advantages over Litlyx, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Plausible significantly outpaces Litlyx in community adoption with 24,656 stars compared to 1,691 stars on GitHub. This 14.6x difference suggests Plausible has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Plausible has 1,388 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Plausible shows more recent development activity with its last commit 16 hours ago, while Litlyx was last updated 5 months ago. This suggests Plausible is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Litlyx uses SCSS, Vue, Nuxt.js while Plausible leverages Bash, JSX, PHP, Elixir.
Plausible has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Litlyx which began 2 years ago. This 5.6-year head start suggests Plausible may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Litlyx is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Plausible uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Litlyx also focuses on Product Analytics.
Both Litlyx and Plausible offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs