Learn how HitKeep and Plausible differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both HitKeep and Plausible have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Plausible significantly outpaces HitKeep in community adoption with 24,849 stars compared to 51 stars on GitHub. This 487.2x difference suggests Plausible has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Plausible has 1,403 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with HitKeep last updated 12 hours ago and Plausible 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: HitKeep uses SCSS, Golang while Plausible leverages JSX, PHP, Elixir.
Plausible has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to HitKeep which began 6 months ago. This 7.0-year head start suggests Plausible may have more mature features and established processes.
HitKeep uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Plausible's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both HitKeep and Plausible offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs