Learn how HitKeep and Plausible differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both HitKeep and Plausible have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Plausible significantly outpaces HitKeep in community adoption with 24,656 stars compared to 42 stars on GitHub. This 587.0x difference suggests Plausible has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Plausible has 1,388 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with HitKeep last updated 19 hours ago and Plausible 14 hours ago.
Plausible has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to HitKeep which began 6 months ago. This 7.0-year head start suggests Plausible may have more mature features and established processes.
HitKeep uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Plausible's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both HitKeep and Plausible offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs