Learn how HitKeep and Plausible differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v2.14.2License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
pascalebeier/hitkeep
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
8 yearsVersion
v3.2.1License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
plausible/analytics
Both HitKeep and Plausible have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Plausible significantly outpaces HitKeep in community adoption with 29,640 stars compared to 98 stars on GitHub. This 302.4x difference suggests Plausible has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Plausible has 1,917 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with HitKeep last updated 6 hours ago and Plausible 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: HitKeep uses Golang, SCSS while Plausible leverages JSX, PHP, Elixir.
Plausible has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to HitKeep which began 1 year ago. This 7.0-year head start suggests Plausible may have more mature features and established processes.
HitKeep uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Plausible's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both HitKeep and Plausible offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs