Learn how Countly and HitKeep differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Countly and HitKeep have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Countly significantly outpaces HitKeep in community adoption with 5,859 stars compared to 51 stars on GitHub. This 114.9x difference suggests Countly has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Countly has 981 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Countly last updated 13 hours ago and HitKeep 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: HitKeep leverages CSS, SCSS, Golang.
Countly has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to HitKeep which began 6 months ago. This 13.6-year head start suggests Countly may have more mature features and established processes.
HitKeep is licensed under MIT, while Countly's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Countly also focuses on Product Analytics.
Both Countly and HitKeep offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs