Learn how Countly and HitKeep differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Countly and HitKeep have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Countly significantly outpaces HitKeep in community adoption with 5,902 stars compared to 88 stars on GitHub. This 67.1x difference suggests Countly has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Countly has 980 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Countly last updated 3 days ago and HitKeep 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: HitKeep leverages CSS, SCSS, Golang.
Countly has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to HitKeep which began 10 months ago. This 13.6-year head start suggests Countly may have more mature features and established processes.
HitKeep uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Countly's other license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Countly also focuses on Product Analytics.
Both Countly and HitKeep offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs