What is the main difference between Aptabase and Countly?

Aptabase and Countly are both product analytics but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Aptabase or Countly?

The choice between Aptabase and Countly depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Aptabase to Countly?

Migration between Aptabase and Countly is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Bright Data – Web data for AI agents and apps. Built-in unblocking, proxies, and ready-made APIs.

Learn more

Aptabase vs Countly

Learn how Aptabase and Countly differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these product analytics is best for you.

Aptabase

Open-source, self-hostable analytics platform for mobile and desktop apps, prioritizing user privacy and data control.

Visit Aptabase Read more

1,853stars+32(+1.8%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
11 days ago
Repository age
4 years
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
aptabase/aptabase

Countly

All-in-one analytics platform for mobile, web, and desktop apps. Track user behavior, monitor performance, and optimize your product.

Visit Countly Read more

5,921stars+14(+0.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
5 hours ago
Repository age
14 years
Version
25.03.56-LTS
License
Other
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
countly-server

Detailed Comparison

Both Aptabase and Countly have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Countly wins

Community & Popularity

Countly significantly outpaces Aptabase in community adoption with 5,921 stars compared to 1,853 stars on GitHub. This 3.2x difference suggests Countly has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Countly has 983 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Aptabase wins

Growth Momentum

Aptabase is growing faster, adding 32 stars in the last 30 days (+1.8%) against adding 14 stars for Countly (+0.2%). Aptabase is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Aptabase last updated 11 days ago and Countly 5 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Aptabase uses CSS, JSX, C#.

Countly wins

Project Maturity

Countly has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Aptabase which began 4 years ago. This 11.0-year head start suggests Countly may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Aptabase is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Countly uses Other. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Product Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Countly extends into Web Analytics.

Comparable