PostHog significantly outpaces Aptabase in community adoption with 37,396 stars compared to 1,765 stars on GitHub. This 21.2x difference suggests PostHog has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, PostHog has 3,112 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Both projects show recent activity, with Aptabase last updated 3 days ago and PostHog 3 hours ago.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Aptabase uses C# while PostHog leverages Python, SCSS, Golang, Rust, C, Objective-C, C++.

PostHog has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Aptabase which began 3 years ago. This 3.2-year head start suggests PostHog may have more mature features and established processes.

Aptabase is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while PostHog's license terms are not publicly specified.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Product Analytics.

PostHog provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Aptabase may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.