Learn how PostHog and Rybbit differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these product analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

PostHog appears to have several advantages over Rybbit, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
PostHog significantly outpaces Rybbit in community adoption with 40,127 stars compared to 13,084 stars on GitHub. This 3.1x difference suggests PostHog has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, PostHog has 3,470 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
PostHog and Rybbit are moving at much the same rate, adding 539 stars and adding 158 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.4% vs +1.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with PostHog last updated 11 hours ago and Rybbit 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: PostHog uses Python, Golang, SCSS, Rust, C, Objective-C, C++ while Rybbit leverages Next.js.
PostHog has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Rybbit which began 2 years ago. This 5.0-year head start suggests PostHog may have more mature features and established processes.
PostHog uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Rybbit's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Product Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Rybbit extends into Web Analytics.
Both PostHog and Rybbit offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs