Learn how PostHog and Rybbit differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these product analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

PostHog appears to have several advantages over Rybbit, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
PostHog significantly outpaces Rybbit in community adoption with 38,791 stars compared to 12,869 stars on GitHub. This 3.0x difference suggests PostHog has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, PostHog has 3,266 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
PostHog is growing faster, adding 1,479 stars in the last 30 days (+4%) against adding 347 stars for Rybbit (+2.8%). PostHog is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with PostHog last updated 4 hours ago and Rybbit 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: PostHog uses Python, SCSS, Golang, Rust, C, Objective-C, C++ while Rybbit leverages Next.js.
PostHog has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Rybbit which began 2 years ago. This 5.0-year head start suggests PostHog may have more mature features and established processes.
PostHog uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Rybbit's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Product Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Rybbit extends into Web Analytics.
PostHog provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Rybbit may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs