Learn how OpenWebAnalytics and Rybbit differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Both OpenWebAnalytics and Rybbit have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Rybbit significantly outpaces OpenWebAnalytics in community adoption with 12,000 stars compared to 2,660 stars on GitHub. This 4.5x difference suggests Rybbit has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Rybbit has 638 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Rybbit shows more recent development activity with its last commit 16 hours ago, while OpenWebAnalytics was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Rybbit is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenWebAnalytics uses PHP while Rybbit leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js.
OpenWebAnalytics has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Rybbit which began 1 year ago. This 13.0-year head start suggests OpenWebAnalytics may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: OpenWebAnalytics is licensed under GPL-2.0 while Rybbit uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Rybbit extends into Product Analytics.
OpenWebAnalytics provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Rybbit may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs