Learn how Betterlytics and OpenWebAnalytics differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Betterlytics and OpenWebAnalytics have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenWebAnalytics significantly outpaces Betterlytics in community adoption with 2,660 stars compared to 156 stars on GitHub. This 17.1x difference suggests OpenWebAnalytics has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenWebAnalytics has 484 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Betterlytics shows more recent development activity with its last commit 12 hours ago, while OpenWebAnalytics was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Betterlytics is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Betterlytics uses Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Rust while OpenWebAnalytics leverages PHP.
OpenWebAnalytics has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Betterlytics which began 1 year ago. This 13.3-year head start suggests OpenWebAnalytics may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Betterlytics is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while OpenWebAnalytics uses GPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both Betterlytics and OpenWebAnalytics offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs