Learn how Betterlytics and Rybbit differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Rybbit appears to have several advantages over Betterlytics, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Rybbit significantly outpaces Betterlytics in community adoption with 12,938 stars compared to 176 stars on GitHub. This 73.5x difference suggests Rybbit has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Rybbit has 739 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Rybbit is growing faster, adding 343 stars in the last 30 days (+2.7%) against adding 4 stars for Betterlytics (+2.3%). Rybbit is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Betterlytics last updated 15 hours ago and Rybbit 5 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Betterlytics uses Rust.
Both projects started around the same time, with Betterlytics beginning 1 year ago and Rybbit 2 years ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Rybbit extends into Product Analytics.
Both Betterlytics and Rybbit offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs