Learn how Betterlytics and Rybbit differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Betterlytics and Rybbit have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Rybbit significantly outpaces Betterlytics in community adoption with 12,752 stars compared to 173 stars on GitHub. This 73.7x difference suggests Rybbit has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Rybbit has 719 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Betterlytics is growing faster, adding 8 stars in the last 30 days (+4.8%) against adding 263 stars for Rybbit (+2.1%). Betterlytics is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Betterlytics last updated 6 hours ago and Rybbit 16 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Betterlytics uses Rust.
Both projects started around the same time, with Betterlytics beginning 1 year ago and Rybbit 2 years ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Rybbit extends into Product Analytics.
Betterlytics provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Rybbit may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs