Learn how Fathom Lite and Rybbit differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Fathom Lite and Rybbit have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Rybbit leads in popularity with 12,869 stars vs 8,015 stars for Fathom Lite. The 61% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Rybbit has 731 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Rybbit is growing faster, adding 347 stars in the last 30 days (+2.8%) against adding 6 stars for Fathom Lite (+0.1%). Rybbit is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Rybbit shows more recent development activity with its last commit 3 days ago, while Fathom Lite was last updated 5 months ago. This suggests Rybbit is being more actively maintained.
Fathom Lite has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Rybbit which began 2 years ago. This 8.3-year head start suggests Fathom Lite may have more mature features and established processes.
Fathom Lite uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Rybbit's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Rybbit extends into Product Analytics.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs