Learn how Fathom Lite and Rybbit differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Rybbit appears to have several advantages over Fathom Lite, particularly in popularity, growth, activity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Rybbit leads in popularity with 12,980 stars vs 8,021 stars for Fathom Lite. The 62% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Rybbit has 742 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Rybbit is growing faster, adding 365 stars in the last 30 days (+2.9%) against adding 9 stars for Fathom Lite (+0.1%). Rybbit is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Rybbit shows more recent development activity with its last commit 1 day ago, while Fathom Lite was last updated 6 months ago. This suggests Rybbit is being more actively maintained.
Fathom Lite has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Rybbit which began 2 years ago. This 8.3-year head start suggests Fathom Lite may have more mature features and established processes.
Fathom Lite uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Rybbit's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Rybbit extends into Product Analytics.
Rybbit provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Fathom Lite may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs