Learn how Plausible and Rybbit differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Plausible and Rybbit have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Plausible leads in popularity with 29,063 stars vs 12,980 stars for Rybbit. The 124% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Plausible has 1,865 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Rybbit is growing faster, adding 365 stars in the last 30 days (+2.9%) against adding 528 stars for Plausible (+1.9%). Rybbit is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Plausible last updated 2 days ago and Rybbit 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Plausible uses PHP, Elixir while Rybbit leverages Next.js.
Plausible has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Rybbit which began 2 years ago. This 6.2-year head start suggests Plausible may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Rybbit extends into Product Analytics.
Both Plausible and Rybbit offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs