Learn how Plausible and Rybbit differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Plausible appears to have several advantages over Rybbit, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Plausible leads in popularity with 29,304 stars vs 13,084 stars for Rybbit. The 124% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Plausible has 1,879 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Plausible is growing faster, adding 435 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 158 stars for Rybbit (+1.2%). Plausible is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Plausible last updated 2 days ago and Rybbit 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Plausible uses PHP, Elixir while Rybbit leverages Next.js.
Plausible has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Rybbit which began 2 years ago. This 6.2-year head start suggests Plausible may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Rybbit extends into Product Analytics.
Both Plausible and Rybbit offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs