Learn how Plausible and Rybbit differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Plausible appears to have several advantages over Rybbit, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Plausible leads in popularity with 24,656 stars vs 12,005 stars for Rybbit. The 105% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Plausible has 1,388 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Plausible last updated 16 hours ago and Rybbit 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Plausible uses PHP, Elixir while Rybbit leverages Next.js.
Plausible has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Rybbit which began 1 year ago. This 6.2-year head start suggests Plausible may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Rybbit extends into Product Analytics.
Plausible provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Rybbit may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs