Learn how Plausible and Swetrix differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Plausible and Swetrix have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Plausible significantly outpaces Swetrix in community adoption with 28,664 stars compared to 1,144 stars on GitHub. This 25.1x difference suggests Plausible has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Plausible has 1,805 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Swetrix is growing faster, adding 51 stars in the last 30 days (+4.7%) against adding 778 stars for Plausible (+2.8%). Swetrix is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Plausible last updated 8 hours ago and Swetrix 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Plausible uses PHP, Elixir while Swetrix leverages NestJS.
Plausible has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Swetrix which began 5 years ago. This 2.3-year head start suggests Plausible may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both Plausible and Swetrix offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs