Learn how Matomo and Swetrix differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Matomo appears to have several advantages over Swetrix, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Matomo significantly outpaces Swetrix in community adoption with 21,726 stars compared to 1,103 stars on GitHub. This 19.7x difference suggests Matomo has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Matomo has 2,878 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Matomo last updated 11 hours ago and Swetrix 16 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Matomo uses Vue, PHP while Swetrix leverages JSX, NestJS.
Matomo has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Swetrix which began 5 years ago. This 10.1-year head start suggests Matomo may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Matomo is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Swetrix uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both Matomo and Swetrix offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Matomovs
PlausibleActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.
