Learn how Countly and Swetrix differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Countly and Swetrix have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Countly significantly outpaces Swetrix in community adoption with 5,891 stars compared to 1,170 stars on GitHub. This 5.0x difference suggests Countly has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Countly has 983 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Swetrix is growing faster, adding 68 stars in the last 30 days (+6.2%) against adding 6 stars for Countly (+0.1%). Swetrix is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Countly last updated 9 hours ago and Swetrix 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Swetrix leverages CSS, JSX, NestJS.
Countly has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Swetrix which began 5 years ago. This 8.9-year head start suggests Countly may have more mature features and established processes.
Swetrix is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Countly's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Countly also focuses on Product Analytics.
Both Countly and Swetrix offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs