Learn how Countly and Swetrix differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Countly and Swetrix have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Countly significantly outpaces Swetrix in community adoption with 5,850 stars compared to 961 stars on GitHub. This 6.1x difference suggests Countly has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Countly has 981 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Countly last updated 1 day ago and Swetrix 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Swetrix leverages CSS, JSX, NestJS.
Countly has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Swetrix which began 5 years ago. This 8.9-year head start suggests Countly may have more mature features and established processes.
Swetrix is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Countly's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Countly also focuses on Product Analytics.
Both Countly and Swetrix offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs