Learn how Countly and OpenPanel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Countly and OpenPanel have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Countly having 5,891 stars and OpenPanel having 6,783 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Countly has 983 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
OpenPanel is growing faster, adding 560 stars in the last 30 days (+9%) against adding 6 stars for Countly (+0.1%). OpenPanel is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Countly last updated 9 hours ago and OpenPanel 17 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenPanel leverages CSS, JSX, Next.js.
Countly has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to OpenPanel which began 2 years ago. This 11.9-year head start suggests Countly may have more mature features and established processes.
OpenPanel is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Countly's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics, Product Analytics.
Both Countly and OpenPanel offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs