Learn how OpenPanel and Umami differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Umami appears to have several advantages over OpenPanel, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Umami significantly outpaces OpenPanel in community adoption with 36,296 stars compared to 5,666 stars on GitHub. This 6.4x difference suggests Umami has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Umami has 6,968 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenPanel last updated 15 hours ago and Umami 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenPanel uses Bash.
Umami has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to OpenPanel which began 2 years ago. This 3.7-year head start suggests Umami may have more mature features and established processes.
Umami uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than OpenPanel's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: OpenPanel also focuses on Product Analytics.
Both OpenPanel and Umami offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs