Learn how Aptabase and OpenPanel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these product analytics is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

OpenPanel appears to have several advantages over Aptabase, particularly in popularity, activity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenPanel significantly outpaces Aptabase in community adoption with 5,657 stars compared to 1,683 stars on GitHub. This 3.4x difference suggests OpenPanel has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenPanel has 347 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
OpenPanel shows more recent development activity with its last commit 4 days ago, while Aptabase was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests OpenPanel is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Aptabase uses C# while OpenPanel leverages Next.js.
Both projects started around the same time, with Aptabase beginning 3 years ago and OpenPanel 2 years ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Product Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: OpenPanel extends into Web Analytics.
OpenPanel provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Aptabase may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs