Learn how Aptabase and OpenPanel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these product analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

OpenPanel appears to have several advantages over Aptabase, particularly in popularity, growth and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenPanel significantly outpaces Aptabase in community adoption with 6,783 stars compared to 1,780 stars on GitHub. This 3.8x difference suggests OpenPanel has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenPanel has 452 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
OpenPanel is growing faster, adding 560 stars in the last 30 days (+9%) against adding 20 stars for Aptabase (+1.1%). OpenPanel is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Aptabase last updated 11 days ago and OpenPanel 18 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Aptabase uses C# while OpenPanel leverages Next.js.
Both projects started around the same time, with Aptabase beginning 3 years ago and OpenPanel 2 years ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Product Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: OpenPanel extends into Web Analytics.
OpenPanel provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Aptabase may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs