Aptabase vs OpenReplay
Learn how Aptabase and OpenReplay differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these product analytics is best for you.
Learn how Aptabase and OpenReplay differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these product analytics is best for you.
Aptabase
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 days agoRepository age
3 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0Repository
aptabase/aptabase
OpenReplay
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v1.27.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
openreplay/openreplay
Detailed Comparison
OpenReplay appears to have several advantages over Aptabase, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenReplay appears to have several advantages over Aptabase, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
OpenReplay significantly outpaces Aptabase in community adoption with 12,559 stars compared to 1,780 stars on GitHub. This 7.1x difference suggests OpenReplay has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenReplay has 807 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
OpenReplay is growing faster, adding 270 stars in the last 30 days (+2.2%) against adding 20 stars for Aptabase (+1.1%). OpenReplay is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Aptabase last updated 11 days ago and OpenReplay 3 days ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Aptabase uses C# while OpenReplay leverages Python, Golang, C, Objective-C, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB.
Project Maturity
OpenReplay has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Aptabase which began 3 years ago. This 1.9-year head start suggests OpenReplay may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Product Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: OpenReplay extends into Performance Monitoring (APM).
Hosting & Deployment
OpenReplay provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Aptabase may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Docmost – Open-source wiki software with real-time collaboration, diagrams, AI, SSO, RBAC permissions and more.