Learn how Betterlytics and Umami differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Umami appears to have several advantages over Betterlytics, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Umami significantly outpaces Betterlytics in community adoption with 38,337 stars compared to 174 stars on GitHub. This 220.3x difference suggests Umami has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Umami has 7,836 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Betterlytics is growing faster, adding 9 stars in the last 30 days (+5.5%) against adding 454 stars for Umami (+1.2%). Betterlytics is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Betterlytics last updated 13 hours ago and Umami 4 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Betterlytics uses Bash, Rust.
Umami has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Betterlytics which began 1 year ago. This 4.8-year head start suggests Umami may have more mature features and established processes.
Umami uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Betterlytics's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both Betterlytics and Umami offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs