Learn how Betterlytics and Umami differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.5.2License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
betterlytics
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v3.5.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
umami-software/umami
Umami appears to have several advantages over Betterlytics, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Umami significantly outpaces Betterlytics in community adoption with 40,120 stars compared to 180 stars on GitHub. This 222.9x difference suggests Umami has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Umami has 8,542 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Umami is growing faster, adding 744 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 2 stars for Betterlytics (+1.1%). Umami is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Betterlytics last updated 7 hours ago and Umami 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Betterlytics uses Bash, Rust.
Umami has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Betterlytics which began 2 years ago. This 4.8-year head start suggests Umami may have more mature features and established processes.
Umami uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Betterlytics's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both Betterlytics and Umami offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs