Learn how Betterlytics and Matomo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Matomo appears to have several advantages over Betterlytics, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Matomo significantly outpaces Betterlytics in community adoption with 21,451 stars compared to 156 stars on GitHub. This 137.5x difference suggests Matomo has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Matomo has 2,837 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Betterlytics last updated 19 hours ago and Matomo 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Betterlytics uses JSX, Next.js, Rust while Matomo leverages PHP, Vue.
Matomo has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Betterlytics which began 1 year ago. This 14.3-year head start suggests Matomo may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Betterlytics is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Matomo uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both Betterlytics and Matomo offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs