Learn how HitKeep and Matomo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 days agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v2.16.1License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
pascalebeier/hitkeep
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
16 yearsVersion
5.14.2License
GPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
matomo-org/matomo
Both HitKeep and Matomo have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Matomo significantly outpaces HitKeep in community adoption with 22,028 stars compared to 106 stars on GitHub. This 207.8x difference suggests Matomo has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Matomo has 2,933 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with HitKeep last updated 7 days ago and Matomo 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: HitKeep uses Golang, SCSS while Matomo leverages PHP, Vue.
Matomo has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to HitKeep which began 1 year ago. This 14.8-year head start suggests Matomo may have more mature features and established processes.
HitKeep uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Matomo's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both HitKeep and Matomo offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs