Learn how HitKeep and Matomo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both HitKeep and Matomo have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Matomo significantly outpaces HitKeep in community adoption with 21,451 stars compared to 42 stars on GitHub. This 510.7x difference suggests Matomo has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Matomo has 2,837 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with HitKeep last updated 19 hours ago and Matomo 11 hours ago.
Matomo has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to HitKeep which began 6 months ago. This 14.8-year head start suggests Matomo may have more mature features and established processes.
HitKeep uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Matomo's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both HitKeep and Matomo offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs