Learn how HitKeep and OpenWebAnalytics differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 days agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v2.16.1License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
pascalebeier/hitkeep
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
15 yearsVersion
1.14.7License
GPL-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
open-web-analytics
Both HitKeep and OpenWebAnalytics have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenWebAnalytics significantly outpaces HitKeep in community adoption with 2,696 stars compared to 106 stars on GitHub. This 25.4x difference suggests OpenWebAnalytics has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenWebAnalytics has 488 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with HitKeep last updated 7 days ago and OpenWebAnalytics 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: HitKeep uses Bash, Typescript, Golang, SCSS while OpenWebAnalytics leverages PHP.
OpenWebAnalytics has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to HitKeep which began 1 year ago. This 13.8-year head start suggests OpenWebAnalytics may have more mature features and established processes.
HitKeep uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than OpenWebAnalytics's GPL-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both HitKeep and OpenWebAnalytics offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs