Learn how HitKeep and OpenWebAnalytics differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both HitKeep and OpenWebAnalytics have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenWebAnalytics significantly outpaces HitKeep in community adoption with 2,662 stars compared to 42 stars on GitHub. This 63.4x difference suggests OpenWebAnalytics has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenWebAnalytics has 484 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
HitKeep shows more recent development activity with its last commit 19 hours ago, while OpenWebAnalytics was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests HitKeep is being more actively maintained.
OpenWebAnalytics has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to HitKeep which began 6 months ago. This 13.8-year head start suggests OpenWebAnalytics may have more mature features and established processes.
HitKeep uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than OpenWebAnalytics's GPL-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both HitKeep and OpenWebAnalytics offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs