Learn how OpenWebAnalytics and Prisme Analytics differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Activity score

Activity score

OpenWebAnalytics appears to have several advantages over Prisme Analytics, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenWebAnalytics significantly outpaces Prisme Analytics in community adoption with 2,677 stars compared to 126 stars on GitHub. This 21.2x difference suggests OpenWebAnalytics has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenWebAnalytics has 487 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
OpenWebAnalytics shows more recent development activity with its last commit 5 days ago, while Prisme Analytics was last updated 5 months ago. This suggests OpenWebAnalytics is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenWebAnalytics uses PHP while Prisme Analytics leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang.
OpenWebAnalytics has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Prisme Analytics which began 3 years ago. This 11.9-year head start suggests OpenWebAnalytics may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: OpenWebAnalytics is licensed under GPL-2.0 while Prisme Analytics uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both OpenWebAnalytics and Prisme Analytics offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs