Learn how OpenWebAnalytics and Plausible differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both OpenWebAnalytics and Plausible have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Plausible significantly outpaces OpenWebAnalytics in community adoption with 24,641 stars compared to 2,660 stars on GitHub. This 9.3x difference suggests Plausible has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Plausible has 1,386 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Plausible shows more recent development activity with its last commit 30 minutes ago, while OpenWebAnalytics was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Plausible is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Plausible leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, Elixir.
OpenWebAnalytics has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Plausible which began 7 years ago. This 6.8-year head start suggests OpenWebAnalytics may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: OpenWebAnalytics is licensed under GPL-2.0 while Plausible uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both OpenWebAnalytics and Plausible offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs