Learn how Bklit and Plausible differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Plausible appears to have several advantages over Bklit, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Plausible significantly outpaces Bklit in community adoption with 24,854 stars compared to 250 stars on GitHub. This 99.4x difference suggests Plausible has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Plausible has 1,403 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Plausible shows more recent development activity with its last commit 15 hours ago, while Bklit was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Plausible is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Bklit uses Next.js while Plausible leverages PHP, Elixir.
Plausible has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Bklit which began 1 year ago. This 6.5-year head start suggests Plausible may have more mature features and established processes.
Plausible is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Bklit's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both Bklit and Plausible offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs