What is the main difference between Bklit and Umami?

Bklit and Umami are both web analytics but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Bklit or Umami?

The choice between Bklit and Umami depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Bklit to Umami?

Migration between Bklit and Umami is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn More

Learn more

Bklit vs Umami

Learn how Bklit and Umami differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.

Bklit

Open-source alternative to Google Analytics offering cookieless tracking, real-time insights, conversion funnels, and GDPR compliance. Start with 3 lines of code.

Visit Bklit Read more

Stars
248
Forks
24
Last commit
22 days ago
Repository age
11 months
Self-hosted
Yes

View Repository

Auto-fetched 10 hours ago.

Umami

A lightweight, open-source alternative to Google Analytics that respects user privacy and provides valuable insights.

Visit Umami Read more

Stars
36,296
Forks
6,968
Last commit
1 day ago
Repository age
6 years
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes

View Repository

Auto-fetched 10 hours ago.

Detailed Comparison

Umami appears to have several advantages over Bklit, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Umami wins

Community & Popularity

Umami significantly outpaces Bklit in community adoption with 36,296 stars compared to 248 stars on GitHub. This 146.4x difference suggests Umami has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Umami has 6,968 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Bklit last updated 22 days ago and Umami 1 day ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Bklit uses Bash.

Umami wins

Project Maturity

Umami has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Bklit which began 11 months ago. This 4.9-year head start suggests Umami may have more mature features and established processes.

Umami wins