Learn how Databuddy and Umami differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Umami appears to have several advantages over Databuddy, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Umami significantly outpaces Databuddy in community adoption with 36,669 stars compared to 1,029 stars on GitHub. This 35.6x difference suggests Umami has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Umami has 7,107 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Databuddy last updated 11 hours ago and Umami 56 minutes ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Databuddy uses Bash, Rust.
Umami has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Databuddy which began 1 year ago. This 4.7-year head start suggests Umami may have more mature features and established processes.
Umami uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Databuddy's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Databuddy also focuses on Product Analytics.
Both Databuddy and Umami offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs